Trump can slap big tariffs on China and Mexico, here are three key ways
President-elect Donald Trump has threatened to slap big tariffs on China and Mexico to help bring jobs back to America.
At first glance, it may seem hard to do without backing from Congress. But actually, Trump doesn’t even need Congress to approve it.
True, the Constitution gives Congress the right to impose tariffs on other nations. However, several complicated laws have been passed in the last 100 years that delegate that power from Congress to the president.
Trump has several options — each open to interpretation — but here are three key ways he can go after China and Mexico.
1. Trump’s biggest weapon: Unlimited tariffs ‘during time of war’
Trump could invoke the “Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917” to hit Mexico and China with tariffs as high as he wants. Under the law, the president can restrict all types of trade “during time of war.” That definition is very loose though.
America doesn’t have to be at war with China or Mexico — it just has to be “at war” somewhere in the world in order to apply tariffs against China or Mexico.
Experts believe U.S. special forces in Syria and Libya would suffice to meet that requirement for Trump to hit China and Mexico with tariffs.
In 1971, President Richard Nixon used this act to impose a 10% import tariff (not directed at any particular nation) citing the Korean War, which had ended nearly two decades prior. Technically, America was still in a state of emergency which had not lifted.
All to say: the excuse of war has very loose meaning for the President to raise tariffs of any kind.
2. Trump’s next best weapon: unlimited tariffs during ‘national emergency’
Think that law is too outdated for Trump to use? There’s another — the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977.
It gives the president authority to use tariffs on another country during a “national emergency.” Again, defining an emergency is vague. Losing manufacturing jobs to Mexico and China would suffice as one and courts have never rejected a president’s reasoning.
“You say ‘it’s an emergency, we’ve lost a lot of jobs and now I’ve got to act. I declare an emergency.’ I think it’s really that simple,” says Doug Irwin, a trade expert at Dartmouth. “If he wants to threaten China or Mexico, he has a lot of leverage.”
The big difference between this Act and the one from 1917 is that Trump can’t seize assets using this one, but that’s not his aim anyway.
